Co-Directors: Varda Shoham &
Michael
Rohrbaugh |
Arizona Family
Heart Project (AzFHP) |
|
American Heart Association (AHA) Grant
# 0051286Z |
|
|
|
Principal Investigator: |
Michael J. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of Arizona |
Co- Investigator: |
Varda Shoham, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of Arizona |
Co-Investigators: |
Gordon Ewy, M.D. Director, Sarver Heart Center College of Medicine University of Arizona |
Summary and
Progress Report |
Recent evidence suggests
that psychosocial factors such as self-efficacy, psychological distress,
perceived social support, and marital quality have prognostic significance
for morbidity and mortality following heart failure (HF). In 2001 we reported
findings from the Michigan Family Heart Project (Coyne, Rohrbaugh, Shoham, et
al., 2001, pdf), indicating that
interview and observational measures of marital quality obtained from 189 HF
patients (139 men and 50 women) and their spouses predicted all-cause patient
mortality over the next 4 years, independent of baseline illness severity
(New York Heart Association [NYHA] class). In 2006 ( pdf
) we presented further follow-up results for this sample, with Cox
regression analyses showing that a couple-level composite measure of marital
quality continued to predict survival over an 8-year period (see Figure 1
below), especially when the patient was female (see Figure 2 below), and did so substantially better than
individual (patient-level) risk and protective factors such as psychological
distress, hostility, neuroticism, self-efficacy, optimism, and breadth of
perceived emotional support. Relationship factors may be especially relevant
in managing a difficult chronic condition like HF, which makes stringent and
complex demands on patients and their families. The Arizona Family Heart
Project (AzFHP; Rohrbaugh, Shoham, and Ewy) was designed to explore how
marital processes influence adaptation to CHF (and the patientŐs ultimate
survival). Participants were 60
couples in which one partner had CHF.
The longitudinal design included home interviews with patients and
spouses (T1); daily-diary reports starting six weeks later (T2); and
follow-up interviews and medical record review at 6 months (T3). The study has been replicated by
colleagues in Spain and Germany.
Data collection in all sites are now complete and we are in the
process of data analyses and report writing. |
Figure 1.
Patient survival for sub-groups formed by crossing high/low marital
quality (MAR) and high/low HF severity (NYHA class): Hi MAR, NYHA I/II (n = 58), Hi MAR,
NYHA III/IV (n = 38), Lo MAR, NYHA I/II (n = 50), Lo MAR, NYHA III/IV (n =
43). Cox regression shows
significant main effects for both marital quality and NYHA class (p <
.001), and the two predictors do not interact (Rohrbaugh, Shoham, &
Coyne, 2006). |
|
Figure 2. Patient survival for sub-groups formed by crossing
high/low marital quality (MQ) and patient gender: High MQ female (n = 36), high MQ male (n = 60), low MQ female (n = 36), low MQ male (n = 60). Cox regression shows significant main
effects for marital quality (p < .001), patient gender (p = .009), and the
MQ x gender interaction (p =.01; Rohrbaugh, Shoham, & Coyne, 2006). |
|