POL.  483

 

  Urban Public Policy

Fall Semester, 2005

 

 

 

Prof.    John A. Garcia                                           Office Phone: 621-7095

Office: Social Sciences 339                                 E-Mail address: jag@email.arizona.edu

Hours: Tu 10:01-11:02; W- 1:27-2:14,                  Web Address: www.arizona.edu/~jag   

           Th   1:10 ‑ 2:24 or By appointment

 

 

 

Core Questions and Issues:

 

 

Politics and cities- how has it “played” itself out and what are the components of the policy making process?

 

What is the state of urban education and where does the responsibility lie?

 

Charter schools, magnet programs, exit exams, vouchers, free market choices,

 national teacher exams, site management—what are these reforms and

what difference does it make?

 

How do citizen and interest groups influence the public policy arenas or alter

the actions of governments?

 

How do the issues of economic growth and development, land use and

sprawl get worked out and by whom?

 

Urban lifestyles, values, the environment, equity, spatial

relationships, market forces and government?

 

At what costs do cities pay to encourage

 economic development and who wins and loses?

Scope of the Course:

           

            This course serves as an in-depth examination of specific urban public policy areas, the governments involved, the policy-making process, and the range of policy practices and alternatives for the selected topic areas. We will use a variety of analytical approaches to the study the complex relationships of people, groups, values, economic, and political structures that influence the quality of life for everyone. The role of local governments (counties, cities, and school districts), state and federal government, along with the bureaucratic agencies represent the constellation of governmental actors involved in our policy arenas. 

 

            We will discuss these policy-making bodies in terms of their functions, authority, structural forms, legal powers, and past/present governing styles. We will then examine the critical actors involved in decision‑making ‑‑such as public officials, economic elites, minorities, neighborhood groups, professional associations, labor, environmental groups and other involved parties. The selected contemporary issues –educational reform and economic development- that are quite important in many urban communities.

 

            We will try to incorporate the current literature with presentation by practitioners and activists to provide as diverse range of views on these issues. We have the opportunity to examine closely the land use and economic planning development efforts of both the City of Tucson and Pima County. Our scope is American cities so that I will draw on many different cities as examples of urban government and public policies, as well as federal and state policies related to these areas. At the same time, we have ample examples of local governmental actions in the Tucson metropolitan to explore and discuss. Also, I will bring in policy efforts of other developed countries for comparative purposes.

 

Course Skills and Learning Goals:

 

            The emphasis of this course will be analysis of the factors that define the urban policy agenda, the policy alternatives or considerations (as well as existing policies), and the implementation of public policy.  How do urban places forge and maintain a community (i.e. economically, socially, and politically) among all of its residents? How does segments of the community makes demands on the political system and what policies get on the agenda or not, are also part of the scope of this course. In addition, we will analyze how the elements of local communities (i.e.- neighborhoods, minority groups, professional groups, business interests, etc.) interact with the political system, in terms of strategies, goals, and outcomes. Analytical treatment of the content of this course entails access to diverse materials, perspectives, frameworks to organize and interpret the information, as well as your own personal experiences with local politics.

           

            Thus, analysis is a process by which you learn to differentiate and categorize (or organize) based on concepts and ideas. Analysis also involves the discovery of relationships between the concepts. For example, the concept of sustainable community is suppose to include the quality of life factors that individuals and groups expect and look for in his or her community and how one gets involved in events, actions, etc. The concept of local governmental functions includes the role, scope, and collective power and/or legitimacy a formal city structure and its officials have over its residents. What is the relationship between sustainable community, economic development, and local governmental functions? 

 

            “At the basis of knowing, then, is a picture or map of how things are categorized and how they fit together. Things that have not been made distinctive cannot be related. There would be no parts to put together. Likewise we cannot have differentiation without relationships, both because we differentiate things by their relationships to each other and because concepts are only useful in a context.”[1]

 

            I will use examples from a number of different communities (your books will also use a variety of communities as case studies), as well as from different historical periods.  An added component of this course will be the discussion of other trends or experiments by cities outside of the United States. What can be learned from other governments and is it applicable to U.S. cities. Most of the emphasis on the policy issues will be on planning and economic development goals and strategies, public and private sectors, educational reform and quality.

 

Books and Readings:

 

            Brookings Papers on Educational Policy, 2004 Edited by D. Ravitch. 2004. Brookings Institutions.

            Brookings Papers on Educational Policy, 2005  Edited by D. Ravitch. 2005. Brookings Institutions.

            It Takes a City. Hill, P. and Campbell, C. 2000. Brookings Institution.

            Planning Local Economic Development  Blakely, E. and T. Bradshaw, 2002. Sage Publications.

            A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. By E. Bardach; Chatam House Publishers. 

 

            The book selections are based on the breadth of perspectives and research findings and analysis available on urban communities and local governments. In addition, the books served to provide you with information, description of events, policy choices, policy results, and case studies across a number of cities. Given the range of topics for the course, the reading assignments will follow, as closely as possible the dates for the topics for discussion. In most cases, the readings will complement the materials presented in class and not duplicate the reading material. At times, I will make direct reference to specific readings, but not always. As you do the readings, and you have questions, comments, and reactions to the reading materials; please make it a point to raise them in class. It is important that you keep up with the reading assignments in a timely fashion, as well as participating in class discussions. Regular attendance is an important factor for doing well in this course.

 

Course Requirements:

 

            The format of the class will be primarily lecture and discussion. At the same time, there will be group exercises, possible Internet assignments, and video presentations.  There may be some guest lecturers and discussion of films/videotapes. The required books are meant to be supplemental to the lecture content.  It is very important for each student to read all of the assigned readings and attend class regularly. Class participation will be expected such that comments, questions, and discussion will help improve the quality of the class. The focus on the urban communities and local politics are such that ongoing events, movements, activities, and issues are occurring while we are “studying” materials in this course. It should serve you well to be reading newspapers, magazines, “list serves”, etc. to complement the content of the course.       

 

            The basis for a final grade will be comprised of three parts. They are:  three equally weighted exams (worth 26 % each); class participation and attendance (7%); and a group student research project worth 15%.

 

            Three equally weighted examinations will be given throughout the fall semester (dates noted on the course calendar). The tests will be drawn from the reading materials, lectures, guest presentations, and the integration of the topics up to the date of the exam. Examinations will be a combination of essays and short answers items. If a student is unable to take the scheduled exam due to illness, he/she must advise Prof. Garcia of this before the examination. Excuses after the examination will not be accepted. It is to everyone's advantage to take the exams when they are scheduled for this course. One week prior to the exam, a core set of essay questions will be distributed which will do two things: a) provide the essay questions from which two will be selected for your exam; and b) help you organize and integrate the materials. In addition, one week before the exam, I will specify the reading materials and lecture topics that will be covered on the exam. The other part of the exam will be a short answer section in which you will have some choices of items to answer.

 

Class participation is an integral part of this course. It is crucial for the learning process and, for this course; it will be credited in the following ways: a) class attendance; b) class discussion and participation; and c) in -class exercises. For every class period, a class roster is passed around for you to initial your attendance. Over the course of the semester, I will be able to put names and faces together so that I can note each of your participation in the course. There is not a quota of the number of times you have to “say something”, but more your contributions to the topics and relating your experiences and knowledge pertinent to the course content. Finally, from time to time, I will give you some very short in class assignments. For example, at the end of a lecture, I may have you provide me, in a sentence or two, the main point of the lecture.

 

The third component of your grade will be group project covering a specific research topic, in which a list will be distributed in the early part of the semester ( the second week of class).  From the list of topics, you will indicate your first and second topic preferences. Then a working group of three to four students will be formed to begin their research on the topic. The research project will include the exploration of the major elements or issues involved, the parties affected and engaged, the current policy, and policy alternatives, and analysis of political dynamics involved. The results of your research efforts will be presented in class with a 20-minute presentation. The instructor will evaluate your research along with input from your fellow students’ through their evaluations. By September 7thth, you will be assigned a research project group and begin your research. The research presentations will be scheduled during the months of late October and November. The group scores will be assigned to each member of the group. It will be worth fifteen percent of the total grade.

 

 Three hour exams @25% each    =    78 %

  Class participation                          =   07 %

                                                                                          Research project                          =    15 %

                                                                100 %

 

Relevant General Course Information

A) Student conduct and integrity: Please be aware of the University’s code of academic integrity regarding research papers, citations, plagiarism, and cheating. Evaluating your own work serves your own learning experiences and grade performance. Once in class, all of our focus should be on the course content and operate in a cooperative and respectful manner.

B) Faculty-Student interaction: The listing of office hours, e-mail address, and office telephone number represent other opportunities to discuss matters relevant to the course or seek clarification. Generally, it is to your benefit (and provides me some feedback) to raise questions or seek other informational sources outside of class. As a faculty member, my responsibilities are not limited by in-class period only.

C) Test and preparation: The format of these tests emphasizes thought and analysis, integration of materials and concepts, organizing your answers, and writing skills. With the essay questions in advance, this enables you to determine the relevant materials, the key sub-questions within each question, how the materials fit together, and ways to organize your answers. Talking to other class members can help to clarify the material and test out your ideas.

D) Research paper: The purpose of this assignment is to hone your analytical skills by focusing on a policy relevant topic facing the Mexican origin community. By stating a research question, you frame the purpose and scope of the paper. It also points you to the types of materials necessary to answer your research question. In addition, the assignment requires you to organize your paper in a way to present best your findings and interpretations. In addition, this assignment should help to improve your writing skills especially in clarity, logic of presentation, and examining different perspectives.

 

Course Schedule:

Date

Course Topic

Readings

Aug. 22 -26

Introduction to the Course

Scope and objectives: Public policy and Urban communities

Public Policy analysis, concepts

Barbach-intro

Ravitich’05- 47-88

Aug. 29-Sept. 2

Case Study of Policy Analysis: the Voting Rights Act

Applying the Bardach Eightfold Steps

Barbach- 1-3

Hill/Campbell- #1

 

Sept. 7-9

The American education dilemma: what is all the fuss about?

A Nation at Risk – Report from the 80’s

Leave No Child Behind, other Presidential commissions

Bardach- 4-7

Hill/Campbell- #2

Ravtich’04- pp. 131-200

 

Sept. 12–16

Over-arching issues in educational reform- equity, access, quality, costs, and choice, standards

An inventory of reform packages and initiatives

Bardach- 8, Part II

Hill/Campbell- #3

 

Sept. 19-23

Testing the teachers and accountability

Training teachers- do we do it differently?

Professional associations and educational reform

Ravitch’04 –pp. 7-45, 201-238

Hill/Campbell- #4

 

 

Sept.26-30

Incentives and recruitment of teachers

School desegregation: persistent issues and limited results

School choice, vouchers and the free market experiment

1st Hour Exam- 9/30

Bardach- part III

Ravitich’04- pp. 45-130

Ravitich’05- pp. 137-174

 

Oct. 3-7

Charter school movement

Parochial and private schools

School based management

Ravitch’05- pp. 89-136

Ravitch’04- pp. 239-264

Oct. 10-14

Contracting in public education

Decision –making in the educational arena

Merit testing and exit exams

Ravitich’05- pp. 175-208

Hill/Campbell- #5,6

Oct. 17-21

The federal government and educational reform

No Child Left Behind- Implementation

School financing and resources for schools

Creating reforms that work

Ravitich’05- 209-250

Hill/Campbell- #7, pp. 129-154

Oct. 24-28

Urban communities-space, people and uses

What is local economic development?

2nd Exam-  10/28

Blakely/Bradshaw- #1

Oct. 31-Nov. 4

Role of local, state, and federal government?

The 2005 New London eminent domain case

 

Blakely/Bradshaw- #2,3

Nov. 7- 9

 

Theories of economic development

Planning, data and the development process

Blakely/Bradshaw- #4,5

Nov. 14-18

Economic Strategies

Professional sports, tourism as economic developments strategies

 

Blakely/Bradshaw- #6,7

Nov. 21-23

Key actors in the politics of economic development

Beyond planning—support, resources and implementation

Blakely/Bradshaw- #8-10

Nov. 25-Dec. 2

Enterprise zones

Rio Nuevo and the Tucson experiment

Blakely/Bradshaw- #11,12

Dec. 5-7

Assessing Economic development—impact, beneficiaries, detractors, and losers

3rd Hour Exam – 12/14  2:00

Blakely/Bradshaw- #13-14

 

                       

                                               

                       

 



[1]Gustavus-Philliber, Susan, M. Schwab, and G. Sam Sloss. 1980 Social Research . F. E. Peacock Publishers; Itasca, Illinois, page 4.