REFERENCES
TO WORK BY GARY PIVO
August 2004
PART 1: URBAN SPRAWL AND
The Net of Mixed Beads: Suburban Office Development
in Six Metropolitan Regions. Journal
of the American Planning Association, 1990.
1.
Chinitz,
Benjamin. 1991. A framework for
speculating about future urban growth patterns in the
2.
Schwartz,
Alex. 1992. Corporate Service Linkages in Large
Metropolitan Areas: A Study of
3.
Archer, Wayne,
R. and Marc T. Smith. 1993. Why Do Suburban Offices Cluster? Geographic
Analysis: An Intl. J. of Theoretical Geography. v25, [n]: 53-64.
4.
Kelly, Eric
Damian. 1993. Managing
Community Growth: Policies, Techniques and Impacts.
5.
Law, R.M., Wolch, J.R. and Takahashi, L.M. 1993.
Defense-Less Territory: Workers, Communties,
and the Decline of Military Production in
6.
Blakeley,
Edward J. 1993. Transporting and Transforming and
Nation. Paper prepared for Metropolitan America in Transition. A Conference sponsored by the Federal Highway
Administration and the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
7.
Chinitz,
Benjamin. 1993. Urban Growth Patterns. Paper prepared for Metropolitan
8.
Henigar and Ray,
Inc. 1994. Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement for the Countywide Planning Policies,
9.
Willson, Richard, W.,
1995. Suburban Parking Requirements: A
Tacit Policy for Automobile Use and Sprawl.
J. of the American Planning
Association, v61, 1:29-42.
10.
Moudon, Anne Vernez. 1995. Teaching Urban Form. Journal of Planning Education
and Research. v
14, 2: 123-133.
11.
Sala, Christine,
1995. Edge Cities. CPL Exchange Bibliography No.
317.
12.
Cervero, Robert and Seskin, Sam.
1995. An Evaluation of the Relationships Between
Transit and Urban Form.
13.
14.
Rosenbloom,
Sandra. 1996. Trends in Women’s Travel Patterns. Women’s Travel Issues: Proceedings from the
Second National Conference.
15.
Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas.
1996. Transit and Urban Form.
Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 16.
16.
Hodge, David,
Morrill, Richard and Stanilov, Kiril. 1996.
Implications of Intelligent Transportation Systems for Metropolitan
Form. Urban Geography
v17, n8.
17.
Beaugegard, R.A. Edge Cities: Peripheralizing
the Center. Urban Geography v16, n8, 1995.
18.
Atkinson,
Robert. Technology and the Future of
Metropolitan Economies. 1995. Prepared for the
19.
Wells, S.S.
and
20.
Jenkens, Lyssa. 1996. Office
Location in a Post-Industrial Urban Environment.
21.
Bourne,
L.S. 1996. Reinventing the Suburbs - Old Myths and New
Realities. Progress in Planning. v46,
n3.
22.
Parsons
Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas. 1996.
Transit and Urban Form: Volume 2.
Transit Cooperative Research Program.
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council,
23.
24.
Cervero, R.L. and Wu,
K.L. 1997. Polycentrism, Commuting, and Residential
Location in the
25.
Gordon, P. and
Richardson, H.L. 1997. Where’s the Sprawl? J. of
the American Planning Association, v63, n2: 225-228.
26.
Catherine L.
Ross and Anne E. Dunning, Land Use Transportation Interaction: An Examination
of the 1995 NPTS Data. Prepared for the
27.
Cervero, R. and Wu,
K.L. 1998. Sub-Centering and Commuting: Evidence from
the
28.
Gordon, P.,
29.
Lowe,
J.C. 1998. Pattens of Spatial Disperson in Metropolitan Commuting. Urban
Geography, 19(3): 232-253.
30.
Weitz, J. and Moore,
T. 1998.
Development Inside Urban Growth Boundaries –
31.
CRB Realty. An
Application for Designation Under Project XL: The
Redevelopment of the Atlantic Steel Site in
32.
Moudon AV, Hess,
PM. 2000. Suburban clusters - The nucleation of
multifamily housing in suburban areas of the
33.
Parsons
Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 2000. Data Collection and Modeling Requirements
for Assessing Transportation Impacts of Micro-Scale Design. Prepared for
34.
Filion, P. 2001.
Suburban mixed-use centers and urban dispersion: what difference do they
make? Environment and Planning A 33(1):
141-160.
35.
36.
Stanilov
K. 2002.
Postwar trends,
land-cover changes, and patterns of suburban development: the case of Greater
Seattle Environment and
Planning B 29 (2): 173-195.
37.
Forkenbrock,
D.J. 2002. Transportation investments
and urban form. Travel Demand and Land Use 2002, Transportation Research Record
1805: 153-160.
38.
Lang,
Robert E. 2003. Edgeless
Cities: Exploring the Elusive Metropolis.
Brookings Institution Press/Brookings Metro Series 2003
39.
Lang, Robert E
and LeFurgy, J.
2003. Edgeless Cities: Examining the Noncentered
Metropolis. Housing Policy Debate. 14 (3): 427-460
40.
O’Sullivan,
Arthur. 2003 Urban Economics, Fifth Edition Chapter 10: Surburbanization
and
41.
Archer, WR and
A Taxonomy of
Suburban Office Clusters. Urban
Studies, 1993.
1.
Shilton, L. and Webb,
J.R. 1995. Headquarters, Office Finance and the Wave of
Urbanization in the
2.
Cervero, Robert and Seskin, Sam.
1995. An Evaluation of the Relationships Between
Transit and Urban Form.
3.
Jenkens, Lyssa. 1996. Office Location in a Post-Industrial Urban
Environment.
4.
Filion, P. 2001.
Suburban mixed-use centers and urban dispersion: what difference do they
make? Environment and Planning A 33(1):
141-160.
5.
Malone-Lee,
L.C., Sim, L.L. and Chin L. 2001.
Planning for a more balanced home-work relationship: the case study of
6.
Coffey, W.J.
and Shearmur, R.G.
2001. The identification of
employment centers in Canadian metropolitan areas: the example of
7.
Shearmur
R, Coffey W.J. 2002. A tale of
four cities: intrametropolitan employment distribution
in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Ottawa-Hull, 1981-1996 Environment and Planning
A 34 (4): 575-598.
8.
Stanilov
K. 2002.
Postwar
trends, land-cover changes, and patterns of suburban development: the case of
Greater Seattle. Environment and Planning B
29
(2): 173-195.
9.
Gaschet
F. 2002.
The new
intra-urban dynamics: Suburbanisation and functional specialisation in French cities. Papers
of the Regional Science Association 81 (1): 63-81.
A Literature Review on the Community Impacts and
Costs of Sprawl.
1993.
1.
Growth Management or Planned Sprawl?: An Assessment of the Interim Urban Growth Areas Adopted
by Washington Counties Under the Growth Management Act. 1993.
2.
Beaumont,
Constance E., 1994. How Superstore Sprawl Can Harm Communities.
3.
4.
Parsons
Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglass. 1996. Transit and Urban Form. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report
16.
5.
Tetra Tech,
Inc. 1996. Green Development Literature Search. Under
EPA Contract #68-C3-0303.
6.
7.
United States
General Accounting Office. 1999. Extent
of Federal Influence on "Urban Sprawl" Is Unclear. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/RCED-99-87.
PART II: LESS AUTO DEPENDENT URBAN FORM
The Urban Form and Journey to Work Impacts of
Office Suburbanization in the
1.
Anonymous, 1991. Book Review of The Urban Form and Journey to Work
Impacts of Office Suburbanization in the
2.
3.
Frank,
Lawrence D.
Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on the Utilization
of Three Modes of Travel, Transportation Research Record 1466,
1994. (With L. Frank)
1.
2.
Cervero, Robert and Kockelman, Kara.
Undated. Travel Demand and the Three Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.
3.
Boarnet, Marlon G. and
Sarmiento, S., 1996.
Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? Urban
Studies.
4.
McNally,
Michael G. and Anup Kulkarni. 1996. An Assessment of the Influence of the
Land-Use Transportation System on Travel Behavior. Institute for Transportation Studies, UC,
5.
Bernick, M. and Cervero, R.
1996. Transit Villages for the 21st Century.
6.
Catherine L.
Ross and Anne E. Dunning, Land Use Transportation Interaction: An Examination
of the 1995 NPTS Data. Prepared for the
7.
Levinson,
David M. and Ajay Kumar. 1997. Density and the Journey to Work. Growth
and Change, vol 28 (2).
8.
Handy, Susan
L. 1997.
Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of
9.
Clarion
Associates, 1998. Measuring & Coping with the Costs of Sprawl: A Summary of the
National Literature on the Costs of Sprawl.
10.
11.
Hess, Paul D.
et al. 1999. Site Design and Pedestrian Travel. Transportation
Research Record 1674, Paper No. 99-0424.
12.
TMIP. 1999.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning Issues: A Primer/Anthology for
Small and Medium MPOs.
13.
Parsons
Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 2000. Data Collection and Modeling Requirements for
Assessing Transportation Impacts of Micro-Scale Design. Prepared for
14.
Frank,
Lawrence D.
15.
Heart, Bennet and Jennifer Biringer,
2000. The Smart Growth – Climate Change Connection. Conservation Law Foundation.
16.
Nelson, Dick
and John Niles. 2000. A
Planning Template for Nonwork Travel and Transit-Oriented
Development: Task 2 Report: Preliminary Template
Design. Submitted to Norman Y. Mineta, International Institute for Surface Transportation
Policy Studies.
17.
Matley, Ted M. et
al. 2000. Pedestrial Travel
Potential in
18.
Jack Faucett Associates.
2000. Livable Communities
Handbook: Land Use and Design Strategies for the South Bay Cities. Prepared for the South Bay Cities Council of
Governments.
19.
20.
Barnes,
21.
Weber, Joe and
Mei-Po Kwan.
2002. Bringing Time Back In: A
Study on the Influence of Travel Time Variations and Facility Opening Hours on
Individual Accessibility. The Professional Geographer, 54(2),
2002.
22.
Knaap, Gerrit. 2002. Talking Smart in the
23.
Envision
24.
Belzer, Dana and
Gerald Autler.
2002. Transit Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Prepared for The
25.
26.
Victoria
Transport Policy Insitute. Undated.
Land Use Impacts on Transport: How Land Use Patterns Affect Travel
Behavior. Online TDM Encyclopedia.
27.
Victoria Transport
Policy Insitute.
Undated. Clustered Land Use. Online
TDM Encyclopedia.
28.
Person, Hollie Lund. Local
Accessibility, Pedestrian Travel and Neighboring: Testing the Claims of New
Urbanism. American Planning Association, 2001 National Planning Conference.
29.
Frank, L. and Engelke, P.O. 2001 The Built
Environment and Human Activity Patterns.
Journal of Planning Literature, v 16, 2.
30.
Forckenbrock, D.J.
2002. Policy Strategies for
31.
32.
Barnes,
33.
34.
Zhang, Ming,
2004. The Role of Land Use in
Relationships Between Land
Use and Travel Bahavior in the
1.
Cervero, Robert. 1996.
Jobs Housing Balance Revisted. Journal
of the American Planning Association.
2.
Cervero, Robert and
John Landis. 1995. The Transportation-Land Use Connection Still
Matters. Access: Research at the University of
3.
4.
Parsons
Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas. 1996. Transit and Urban Form. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report
16.
5.
6.
Porter,
Douglas. 1997. Synthesis of Transit Practice 20: Transit
Focused Development. Transit Cooperative
Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research
Council.
7.
Snyder, Ken
and Lori Bird. 1998. Pay the
Costs of Sprawl: Using Fair-Share Costing to Control Sprawl.
8.
Burchell, Robert et
al. 1998. The Costs of Sprawl - Revisited.
Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 39.
9.
Frank,
Lawrence D.
10.
Criterion
Planners/Engineers and Fehr & Peer
Associates. 2001. Index
4D Method: A Quick Response Method of Estimating Travel Impacts from Land-Use
Changes. Prepared for the
11.
City of
12.
13.
Holtzclaw, John, et
al. 2002. Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and
Socioeconomic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use – Studies in
14.
California
Department of Transportation Business, Transportation and Housing Agency. 2002. Statewide Transit-Oriented Development
Study: Factors for Success in
15.
16.
Transit and
Land Use Form. 2002. Prepared for Regional Planning,
Land Use Trends Affecting Auto Dependence in
Washington’s Metropolitan Areas, 1970-1990. 1995. Washington State Department of
Transportation (NTIS #WA-RD 380.1).
1.
Porter,
Douglas. 1996.
2.
Veseley,
James. 1997. Kirkland-By-The-Sea Attains a Rare
Identity.
3.
Rutherford,
G. Scott; Edward McCormack and Martina Wilkinson (1997). Travel Impacts of Urban Form: Implications from an Analysis of Two
4.
Holtzclaw, John, et
al. 2002. Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and
Socioeconomic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use – Studies in
A Summary of Guidelines for Coordinated Urban
Design, Transportation and Land Use Planning with an Emphasis on Encouraging
Alternatives to Driving Alone.
1.
Ocken, Rebecca. 1994.
Bibliography on Pedestrian Oriented Design. LUTRAQ Update.
2.
3.
Learning From Truckers:
Moving Goods in Compact Livable Urban Areas.
1997. Washington State Department of Transportation
1.
Morris AG,
Kornhauser AL 2000.
Relationship of freight facilities in central business district office buildings
to truck traffic. Freight Transportation Research.
Transportation Research Record (1707):
56-63.
2.
Lawson,
Catherine T. and
James G. Strathman.
2002. Survey Methods for
Assessing Freight Industry Opinions. For
Oregon Department of Transportation Research Group and
How Do You Implement Less Auto Dependent Urban
Form? 1997. Washington State
Department of Transportation.
1.
2.
PART III: RURAL LAND CONSERVATION AND CHARACTER
Rural Cluster Zoning: Survey and Guidelines. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 1990.
1.
Knack, Ruth Eckdish. 1990. Selling Cluster. Planning.
2.
Corser Ernst,
Susan. 1994. Preserving Rural Character Through
Cluster Development. PAS Memo.
3.
Baker,
Cathy. 1992. Evaluating Innovative Techniques
for Resource Lands, Part I: "Clustering".
4.
State of
5.
The
6.
Kelly, Eric
Damian. 1993. Managing
Community Growth: Policies, Techniques and Impacts.
7.
Kasowski, Kevin. 1993.
8.
9.
Municipal
Research and
10.
11.
Office of
Coordinated Planning,
12.
Davenport,
Steve.
13.
National
Association of Homebuilders. Mixed Use
and Compact Development. [Online] Available http://www.nahb.org/generic.aspx?sectionID=628&genericContentID=16945,
Projected Impacts of the Snoqualmie Ridge
Annexation Proposal on the Rural Character of
1.
Corser Ernst,
Susan. 1994. Preserving Rural Character Through
Cluster Development. PAS Memo.
How Do You Define Community Character?
1.
Urbanska, W. and F.
Levering. 1996. Moving to a
PART IV: GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Thinking About Growth for the Bay Area and People
for Open Space. Regional
Exchange.
1.
Bay Area
Council. 1988. Making
Sense of the Region’s Growth.
The Arrival of Performance Based Growth Management. 1989. Urban
Land. v48.
1.
Birch, Eugenie
L. 1990.
The Bloom is on the Rose: Planning in the Nineties. Journal
of the American Planning Association, v56, 3:377.
2.
Burby, Raymond. 1990.
Predicting the Impacts of Land Development. Conference Paper. Association of Collegiate Schools of
Planning, 32nd Annual Conference.
Growth in
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
State of
6.
7.
Nelson, Dick
and Shakow, Don.
1994. Applying Least Cost Planning to
Fair and Balanced Approaches to Resolving the
Property Rights Debate. 1995.
Unpublished Technical Memorandum.
1.
Is the Growth Management Act Working?
1.
State of
2.
Burby, Raymond J. and
May, Peter. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in
Managing Land Use.
3.
Weitz, Jerry. 2001.
Growth Smart: Coming to a Calssroom Near You? Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:84-91.
Toward Growth Management Monitoring in
1.
State of
2.
Andranovich, Gregory
D. and Riposa, Gerry.
1993. Doing Urban Research.
3.
State of
4.
Thompson,
Laura A. with Stuart Meck. May 1995. Reform of Planning Statutes: A
Bibliography. Planning Advisory Service
Memorandum.
5.
American
Planning Association. 1996. Modernizing State Planning Statutes: The
Growing Smart Working Papers. Volume 1.
Planning Advisory Service Report No. 462/463.
Local Government Planning Tools. 1992.
1.
Real Estate
Economics, 1993. Growth Management vs. Market Realities.
2.
Johnson, Sara
E. and Jacobs, Harvey M., 1994. Public
education for growth management: lessons from
3.
Helsley, R.W. and
Strange, W.C. 1995. Strategic Growth Controls. Regional
Science and Urban Economics. v25,
n4.
4.
Porter,
Douglas. 1996. Performance Standards for Growth
Management. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 461.
5.
Heywood,
P. 1997.
The Emerging Social Metropolis: Successful Planning Initiatives in 5
6.
Talen, Emily and Gerrit Knaap. 2003.
Legalizing Smart Growth: An Empirical Study of Land Use Regulation in
Regional Efforts to Achieve
Sustainability in
1.
Peter Calthorpe and William Fulton. 2001. The
PART V: SUSTAINABLE CITIES
Toward Sustainable Urbanization on Mainstreet Cascadia. 1995.
1.
Greater
Vancouver Regional District,
2.
Artibise, Alan. Cascadian
Adventures: Shared Visions, Strategic Alliances, and Ingrained Barriers in a Transborder Region.
Unpublished manuscript.
1996.
3.
Hodge, David
C., 1995. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Land Use,
and Sustainable Transportation. Paper
Presented at the ITS
4.
Krizek, K.J., 1996. A Planners Guide to Sustainable
Development. Planning Advisory Service Report.
Toward Sustainable Urbanization on Mainstreet Cascadia. Cities
13(5): 339-354. 1996.
1.
Cascadia’s Bustling
Main Street: New Approaches to Urbanization Can Save Region’s High Quality of
Life. The
1.
2.
Letters to the
Editor. Cascadia
Growth Managment: Add an “A” for Accountability. The
3.
Letters to
the Editor. Cascadia
Growth Management: Don’t Manhattanhize Seattle –
Support Anti-Progress. The
4.
Frenkel, 1997. Introduction
to Geography: A Reader.
5.
1000
Friends of
PART VI:
PHYSICAL PLANNING
Physical Planning Thought: Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 1990.
1.
Moudon, Anne Vernez. 1995. Teaching Urban Form. Journal
of Planning Education and Research, v 14, 2: 123-133.
Specializations, Faculty Interest and Courses in
Physical Planning Subjects at Graduate Planning Schools. Journal of Planning Education and Research,
1989.
1.
Miller, D. and
Westerlund, F.
1990. Specialized land use
curricula in urban planning graduate programs. Journal of Planning Education
and Research. v9, 3: 203.
2.
Dagenhart, R. and Sawicki, D.
1992. Architecture and Planning:
The Divergence of Two Fields. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12:1:16.
3.
Alterman, R. 1992.
A Transatlantic View of Planning Education and Planning Practice. Journal
of Planning Education and Research, 12: 39-54.
4.
Carter,
Emanuel J. 1993. Toward a Core Body
of Knowledge: A New Curriculum for City and Regional Planners. Journal
of Planning Education and Research, v12. 2: 160-163.
5.
Lucy, William
H., 1994. If Planning Includes Too Much, Maybe It
Should Include More? Journal of the American Planning
Association. v60, 3: 305-318.