Educational Site
Evaluation Rubric
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Navigation |
Very easy to navigate, all links work, and menus are visible and clear |
Generally easy to navigate, links work, menus visible |
Not hard or easy to navigate and links work |
Difficult to navigate in an organized way no visible menu or working links |
Extremely difficult near impossible to navigate no links |
Visual Appearance |
Layout is clear and easy to follow, backgrounds and text work well together, colors are relaxed |
Layout is generally clear and easy to follow, colors relaxed, background fine, but overall visually boring |
Layout can be followed and read but colors and text clash |
Layout hard to follow and read, confusing, colors, background, and text don’t work together, too bright or dark |
Cannot read due to layout structure, background, color, and text |
Graphics |
Graphics are labeled, relevant to topic, and appropriately placed, sized just right |
Graphics are relevant to topic, sized, and appropriately placed but are not labeled |
Graphics relevant to topic but inappropriately placed and sized |
Graphics irrelevant to topic or missing |
Graphics take away site “value,” hide text, or confuse and distract |
Content |
Content is well organized and structured, relevant, clearly explained, current, accurate, and credible |
Content is well organized and structured, and relevant, but not clearly explained |
Content not organized or structured well information all over the place |
Lacks organization, content is dated not accurate or credible |
Little to no clear content and site purpose not known |
Mechanics |
Language is professional and suitable to the audience , grammar used correctly, site needs little or no editing |
Language is more informal and site shows minor grammatical, punctual, and spelling errors |
Use of slang or technical terms that’s not suitable to the audience and many grammatical, punctual, and spelling errors |
Needs major editing for grammatical, punctual, and spelling errors, too much use of inappropriate language for intended audience |
Content is unreadable due to language and extensive errors in grammar and spelling |
Educational Software Package Evaluation Rubric
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Cost |
Cost is affordable and not over $50 |
Cost is affordable but over $50 |
Cost is neither affordable nor expensive |
Cost is expensive |
Cost is unreasonable |
Usability |
Extremely easy to use and implement, operates on many systems, compatible |
Easy to use but only operates on one or two systems |
Generally not easy or hard to use but takes time to master |
Difficult to use and implement, not very compatible |
Impossible to use without lots of tech support |
Support |
Tech support is quick, effective, and provided through multiple working avenues such as phone, email, and online chat support |
Tech support is effective and only provided through email only |
Tech support is provided but doesn’t always work |
Tech support is slow and ineffective |
No tech support provided |
Appropriate for Audience |
Follows principals of learning, matched to instructional level of students yet challenging, appropriate vocabulary, and engaging |
Matched to instructional level of students yet challenging, appropriate vocabulary, but lacks the ability to engage students |
Vocabulary not suitable to audience, too challenging or too easy for the instructional level of students |
Not engaging and instructional level is mismatched |
Fails to follow principals of learning |
Description |
Description of product is relevant, concise, and clearly explained with lots of examples |
Description of product is concise and relevant but does not give many examples |
Description of product is too short or too long containing irrelevant information, not clear and no examples |
Product is not clearly explained in a concise manner |
Little to no description of product |
Evaluations
|
Navigation |
Visual Appearance |
Graphics |
Content |
Mechanics |
Discovery Education |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
PBS Teachers |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|
Cost |
Usability |
Support |
Appropriate for Audience |
Description |
Rocky Mountain Learning Systems: Academic Fitness Middle School V2 from Weekly Reader |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |