WHEN
TO DOCUMENT
Quoting,
Paraphrasing, and Acknowledging Sources
College writing often involves
integrating information from published sources into your own writing.
This means you need to be careful not to plagiarize: "to steal and pass
off (the ideas and words of another) as one's own" and to "present as
new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source."1 The University of Wisconsin takes very
seriously this act of "intellectual burglary," and the penalties are
severe. Paying attention to the following should help keep you honest.
WHAT
MUST BE DOCUMENTED
1. Quotations
If you use an author's specific word or words, you must place those
words within quotation marks and
you must credit the source.
2. Ideas
If you borrow an author's specific ideas, you must document their
source. As Birk and Birk explain, it is plagiarism
when the writer
presents, as his [sic] own, the
sequence of ideas, the arrangement of material, the pattern of thought
of someone else, even though he expresses it in his own words. The
language may be his, but he is presenting as the work of his brain, and
taking credit for, the work of another's brain. He is, therefore,
guilty of plagiarism if he fails to give credit to the original author
of the pattern of ideas.
This aspect of plagiarism presents difficulties because the line is
sometimes unclear between borrowed thinking and thinking that is our
own. We all absorb information and ideas from other people. In this way
we learn. But in the normal process of learning, new ideas are
digested; they enter our minds and are associated and integrated with
ideas already there; when they come out again, their original pattern
is broken; they are re-formed and rearranged. We have made them our
own. Plagiarism occurs when a sequence of ideas is transferred from a
source to a paper without the process of digestion, integration, and
reordering in the writer's mind, and without acknowledgment in the
paper.2
3. Common
Knowledge
It is not necessary to document certain
factual information considered to be in the public domain: e.g., birth
and death dates of well-known figures, generally accepted dates of
military, political, literary and other historical events. In general,
factual information contained in multiple standard reference works can
usually be considered to be in the public domain. If, however, you use
the exact words of the reference source, you must credit the source. If
in doubt, be cautious and cite the source.
TO CREATE A SUCCESSFUL
SUMMARY OR PARAPHRASE
- When reading source material, treat each passage as a discrete
unit of thought to be assimilated
into your own thoughts. Try to understand the passage as a whole,
rather than pausing to write down ideas or phrases that seem, on first
inspection, significant. Read
purposefully, with a larger conceptual framework in clear view,
and integrate each reading
into that controlling purpose.
- After reaching a clear understanding of the ideas contained in
the source, summarize that
information in your own words.
Remember that you are taking
notes, not copying down quotations. Your task is to extract, distill
and compress essential content that will be useful in creating a
paraphrase. Occasionally you may find it useful to quote words or
phrases directly from the source, but limit yourself to very brief
quotations, and be sure to use quotation marks and to record page
numbers in your notes.
SAMPLE
PARAPHRASES--Unsuccessful and Successful
Based on paragraph A below, consider
two improper ways of handling source material: (B) word-for-word
plagiarism and (C) "The Mosaic." Finally, paragraph D provides a model
of a legitimate paraphrase.
A. The Source
"How important is our power of
nonanalytical thought to the practice of science? It's the most
important thing we have, declares the Princeton physicist historian
Thomas Kuhn who argues that major breakthroughs occur only after
scientists finally concede that certain physical phenomena cannot be
explained by extending the logic of old theories. Consider the belief
that the sun and the planets move around the earth, which reigned prior
to 1500. This idea served nicely for a number of centuries, but then
became too cumbersome to describe the motions of heavenly bodies. So
the Polish astronomer Copernicus invented a new reality that was based
on a totally different `paradigm' or model--that the earth and planets
move around the sun" (Hoover, 124).
B. Word-for-word
plagiarism
Non-analytic
thought is considered very
important to the practice of
science by Princeton
physicist historian Thomas Kuhn who claims that major
breakthroughs happen only
when scientists
finally concede that some physical
phenomena defy explanation by extending
the logic of old theories.
One idea which served nicely
for many centuries but
then became too cumbersome
was the belief
that the sun and planets
revolved around the earth.
This was held prior to 1500
until Copernicus
invented a new reality: the earth and planets move around the sun.
The underlined
words are directly
copied from the source. Notice that the writer has not only "borrowed"
Hoover's ideas with no acknowledgment, he or she has maintained the
author's method of expression and sentence structure. Even if the
student-writer had acknowledged Hoover as the source of these ideas,
this passage would still be plagiarized because much of its exact
wording comes from Hoover with no quotation marks to indicate that the
language is Hoover's. It's not that using a single phrase such as
"prior to 1500" without quotation marks constitutes plagiarism; it's
the repeated use of exact wording and sentence structure without any
quotation marks. If, for example, you used just that one phrase without
quotation marks--a phrase whose language isn't particularly
distinctive--and
acknowledged the source of the ideas, that would be fine.
If quotation
marks were placed around all material directly taken from Hoover, this
paragraph would be so cluttered as to be unreadable. If you like the
ideas and the wording of the original this much, if it is important to
your paper, and if it is stated more concisely in the original than it
would be in your paraphrase or summary, then quote the original.
C. The Mosaic
Intuition plays an important role in
scientific progress. Thomas Kuhn believes that nonanalytical thought
allows scientists to break
through the logic of old theories to formulate new paradigms to explain a new reality. Copernicus'
invention of one such model (a reversal of the Ptolemaic view which reigned prior to 1500)
claimed that the earth and
planets rotate around
the sun.
Note the underlined phrases which
have been borrowed from the original and shifted around. Hoover's
structure has been modified to a certain extent by the writer, but
numerous key phrases have been retained without
quotation marks, and the
source has not been credited.
D. A Legitimate
Paraphrase
In "Zen: Technology and the Split
Brain," Hoover suggests that the power of intuition--that suprarational
half of our intelligence--is more important to scientific advancement
than the function of the left hemisphere of our brain--the rigidly
logical and process-oriented portion. He cites the revolution in
thinking created by Copernicus' new paradigm of cosmic movement, a leap
in understanding made possible only by the creative invention of "a new
reality" after rational consideration of the old reality had exhausted
itself (124).
Hoover's ideas
and specific language have been documented (by direct references to the
author, by citations to his article, and by quotation marks where
specific language has been used). Notice too that Hoover's language and
structure have been modified to fit this student-writer's own purpose.
INTRODUCING QUOTATIONS
Introduce
a quotation by signalling that it is coming and perhaps by
indicating your purpose in using it. You may name the title of the
source and the author in a signal phrase: In her book Contemporary Feminist Thought,
Eisenstein warns against a "false universalism that addresses itself to
all women." Or you may wish to name only the author: In a discussion of
Enlightenment political philosophy, Eisenstein asserts that while
"liberal theory contested the divine right of monarchs and aristocrats
to political rule . . . ," women questioned the "divine" right of men
to deny suffrage to half the population.3 There are many graceful ways to
integrate a quotation into your text, but try to keep in mind that
quotations are confusing if they appear to "drop from the sky."
PUNCTUATING AND
FORMATTING QUOTATIONS
Short direct prose quotations should
be incorporated into the text of the paper and enclosed in double
quotation marks. For example: According to Jonathan Clarke,
"Professional diplomats often say that trying to think diplomatically
about foreign policy is a waste of time."4
For a quotation within a quotation, use
single quotation marks. For example: The new head of General Motors is
cautiously optimistic about the influence the resurgent U.S. auto
industry can have on the entire domestic economy, according to a recent
Time magazine story. "All
told, GM's Smith estimates, the recovering industry is now strong
enough to add 1 1/2%--$20 billion--to the nation's gross domestic
product in the last quarter of this year. `It's been a long time, but
you always thought of the U.S. auto industry as the engine of economic
recoveries in the 1950s and '60s,' says Smith. `I think we could be
that kind of locomotive again.'"5
Quotations
of four or more typewritten lines should be set off from your
text in single spacing and indented in their entirety, generally 5 or
10 spaces from the left margin, with
no quotation marks at beginning or end. (See the extended
quotation on page 1 of this handout.) Rules about how many spaces to
indent and about whether to single- or double-space extended quotations
vary with different documentation systems; check the guidelines for the
particular system you're using.
Quotations
of up to three lines of poetry should be integrated into your
sentence. For example: In Julius
Caesar, Antony begins his famous speech with "Friends, Romans,
Countrymen, lend me your ears; / I come to bury Caesar, not to praise
him" (III.ii.75-76). Notice that a slash (/) with a space on either
side is used to separate lines.
More
than three lines of poetry should be indented. As with any
extended (indented) quotation, do not use quotation marks unless you
need to indicate a quotation within your quotation.
Use an ellipsis (. . .) only when it is not
obvious that you are quoting only a portion of the whole.
Within quotations, use square brackets [ ] (not
parentheses) to add your own clarification, comment, or correction. For
example, the material enclosed in square brackets in the following
sentence was added to clarify the quotation: "He [Hamlet] changes
significantly after seeing Fortinbras and his army." Use [sic], which
is Latin for "in this manner," to indicate that a mistake or problem of
some sort is in the original material you are quoting and is not a
mistake you introduced in your transcription.
Place
commas and period inside
the closing quotation
marks, but all other punctuation marks--such as semicolons,
colons, exclamation points and question marks--go outside the closing quotation marks
except when they are part of the quoted material.
______________________________
1. Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary,
10th ed. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, 1993), 888.
2. Newmann P. Birk and Genevieve B. Birk, A Handbook of Grammar,
Rhetoric, Mechanics, and Usage, 5th ed. (Indianapolis:
Bobbs-Merrill,
1976), 142.
3. Hester Eisenstein, Contemporary
Feminist Thought: An Assessment (Boston: G.K. Hall, 1983), 43,
53.
4. "The Conceptual Poverty of U.S. Foreign Policy," Atlantic, September 1993, 55.
5. William McWhirter, "Back on the Fast Track," Time, 13 December 1993, 64.
FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION
For further information on
summarizing and paraphrasing sources, see any of these books:
- Hairston, Maxine, and John J. Ruszkiewicz. The Scott, Foresman Handbook for Writers.
3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins, 1993.
- Hodges, John C., and Mary E. Whitten. Harbrace College Handbook. 11th ed.
San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1990.
- Lunsford, Andrea, and Robert Connors. The St. Martin's Handbook. New
York: St. Martin's 1989.
- Spatt, Brenda. Writing from
Sources. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.
For information about specific
documentation systems, consult the guide for the system you're using.
If you're not sure which documentation system to use, ask the course
instructor who assigned your paper. The following are just a few of the
most commonly used guides:
- American Medical Association, Manual
for Authors and Editors
- Council of Biology Editors, CBE
Style Manual
- The Chicago Manual of Style
- MLA Handbook for Writers of
Research Papers
- Publication Manual of the
American Psychological Association
© The Writing Center
6171 Helen C. White Hall
University of
Wisconsin-Madison
September 2001