It may help to approach the answer to the question by using the source of the answer as a point of departure. For parts of the answer from the lectures, see the item and follow its link to the text of the answer. Following the lectures is the text of answers from the reading. And following that are sample of excellent answer from an actual exam.
Click on the link for the text of each answer
Lectures hereafter are on the final exam
New Regime in Pennsylvania (June 18+)
preparations for a new
state government
Conference (June 18)
composition
rules for state constitution convention
franchise and oaths: widened and narrowed
Pennsylvania constitutional
convention
election to: misapportionment
preliminary business
new state constitution
franchise, elections, offices
ratification?
revenge of the opposition
Meaning of 1776 and the Revolution
"Novus Ordo Seclorum"
(Meaning of Revolution, Part I)
Manifestos:
Tom Paine, "Common Sense"
Jefferson, "Declaration of Independence"
Old Order
hierarchy (monarchy and aristocracy)
hereditary status/attributed status
universal deference
New Order (liberal)
natural rights;life, liberty, pursuit of happiness
particular deference and many hierarchies
Republicanism (Meaning of Revolution, Part II.)
models/history lessons: ancient republics and republicans
community (common good, public interest) vs. individualism
republican virtues or ideals
property and leisure
agricultural society
` personal independence
monarchical order and power vs. republican order
laws, courts, punishment, state church, standing army
conflicting values
republicanism and community vs. individualism and pursuit of personal
happiness
Adam Smith,
"Wealth of Nations" (1776)
reconciling conflicting
values
Slavery, Abolition, and the Revolution
slavery in the language of the Revolution
American responses
Thomas Jefferson
paradoxes
color, beauty
racial mixing
chain of being
colonization
nature versus nurture
nature: species, monogenesis, polygenesis
environmental debate and examples
Abolition: "runaway" emancipation
Abolition in South: private and runaways
Abolition in North: public
judicial (Mass., 1781)
statutory and gradual
Pennsylvania (1780)
resistance
the law: gradual
early decline of slavery
other Northern states
Constitution and slavery (see discussion from Colliers,
Decision)
characterizing the framers/compromising
3/5 clause
slave trade
other provisions
The Economy and Divisions in Politics and People in
Pennsylvania, 1779
price rise
agitation and protests
price controls (May 1779)
protests and competing economic theories: public interest versus free markets
complexity of controls and factions produced
"Ft. Wilson" riot (Oct. 5, 1779)
end of controls (fall 1779)
division in the radicals/Constitutionalist Party
Paine's surprising realignment
Financing the Revolution: national versus state power
paper currency ($226M)
commissary and quartermaster certificates ($95M)
loan certificates (bonds) (about $60M)
foreign loans ($2.3M in specie)
power shifts
1775-1779 national power
1779-1781 state power
specific supplies, army pay, and redemption of commissary certificates
1782-1784 national resurgence
Robert Morris, Superintendent of Finance
problem: Articles of Confederation
Morris's program
no supplies, pay, or redemption of certificates
specie from states
impost tax
Bank of North America
outcomes
debt collected by U.S. government
1783-1787 state resurgence
dismantling Morris, redistributing the debt
Constitutional convention
Bank of North America
public and private character
assets
specie-backed currency
fear of depreciation
loan policy and practice
Pa. taxes--1782
European investors' and bankers' opinions
jeopardy & liability of American speculators
` Constitution
Hamilton's program (1791)
funding the U.S. debt
assuming and funding the states' debts
"full faith and credit"
Ratification
Pennsylvania and ratification
the vote in the U.S.
Hamilton (Federalist Paper, #35) and the vote
Madison (Federalist Paper, #10) and divisions
READINGS
Martin & Lender, A Respectable Army
Had Americans been truly unified and patriotic, ready to sacrifice all for the community, the public interest, the there would have been a Continental Army that numbered as many as 75,000 men. That was never the case and the army often numbered about 12,000 men. (USE NUMBERS HERE.) In the years 1775-1776, there was a outpouring of volunteers and the prospect of a continued supply of them. But after the Battle of Long Island, conscription was needed and even then it did not work well. Men needed to be obliged or coerced or lured into public service. The lack of men and volunteers is symptomatic of the number of Loyalists or indifferent or disenchanted Americans, a fundamental division of the populace. John Adams estimated that only one-third of Americas were Patriots. Another third were Loyalists and the last third did not care about either side in the contest.
Next, still on the army, the army became skilled, unified, dedicated,
and virtuous in a ironically republican
way, even as it became a professional (mercenary) army. But the army's internal unity only proves
that the whole country or all Americans were not unified; the
army felt alienated from the selfish general public. The soldiers had a
low opinion of the public and the public in turn disparaged
the men in the army, especially the officers. The army was divided from
the public, and division is significantly not republican.
The mutinies in the army--the Pennsylvania and New Jersey lines in
especially--demonstrate how the public and the Congress slighted the enlisted
men (over terms and length of enlistment, and enlistment bonuses) and how the
enlisted men were alienated from the government and their own officers (whom
they attacked and shot). (You may add details here.)
The potential revolt of the officers at Newburg in
1783 (Major John Armstrong, Gen. Gates), in conjunction with nationalists like Robert Morris, was a sign that
the country was profoundly divided and the officers alienated. The
officers felt abused and feared that the Congress would never reward them with
pensions or lump sum payments. The nationalists, especially Robert Morris,
feared that once the treaty of peace was concluded, there would be no chance to
create a more powerful national government. alter the Articles of Confederation. Together the nationalists and
officers plotted to use the threat of force to get payment and even to
reconstruct the government in a more national model. It was a possible
coup, a conspiracy that threatened public and civilian control of the country
and its armed forces. (Fortunately, Washington saw what was at sake and
stopped it.) (You may add details here.)
Bouton, "A Road Closed"
There existed a deep division in American between debtors and creditors, paper currency versus specie or specie currency advocates, farmers versus merchants and bankers like Robert Morris and tax collectors like John Nicholson. In the 1780s and later, this division(s) appeared as prosecution of debtors and famers for unpaid taxes (as well as unpaid private debts to merchants). Large portions of the whole population of taxpayers of a county were prosecuted. Prosecutions provoked successful resistance to state authorities including even the state militia. Creditors, bankers, and nationalists were enraged at the success of resistors and at the feebleness of state governments; they vowed to reform the situation. Morris tried and failed (1782-1783). But nationalists succeed with the Constitution. However, remember, the resistance did not end in 1789; roads were closed in the 1790s too and resistance escalated to the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794. The division was long and profound.
Colliers, Decision
Government and the U.S. Constitution. In the
Confederation period and in the Articles of Confederation, the U.S. was thirteen
sovereign states. The central government was more like some United Nations.
In the constitutional convention, many differences and divisions were obvious
and profound. The two biggest were the differences between large and small
states, and the resulting debates over representation, the Congress, the
presidency/electoral college; and the second, was the division over slavery, representation of slaves, and the slave trade. Commerce was
another divisive issue. And yet, these differences were compromised or
submitted to. [You may list the compromises, but do not go into great
detail how the compromises were hammered out. If they brought us together,
that is enough said.] One constitution/government resulted. But
it was still a federated government, with states remaining in existence and
until the Civil War, a claim to sovereignty. There were yet other, smaller
divisions in the convention.
The U.S. Constitution speaks to the problem of divisions and diversity. First is
the division into 13 states. The Constitution created a national government that
consolidated power or much power and diminished the stature of the states.
Madison, in the 10th Federalist, argued that great geographic scope of the U.S.
and the accompanying diversity and divisions among Americans served the public
interest (!) and defeated small selfish and possibly oppressive interests!
Republics did not require that they be limited to a small area with a single,
homogeneous people--like one community of harmonious people. From
David Hume, Madison explained that republics would work better in a large area
with diverse interests, that many interests would deter the creation of an
oppressive majority. The result would be something that could be called
the public interest, or the general welfare. For almost all wrong reasons,
you got back to the "res publica" that the early revolutionaries spoke
of and that Paine never explained.
Overall, the U.S. was divided in ways that no one ever anticipated or wanted,
but the framers compromised many of their differences and ironically erected a
government that made a virtue of divisions (viz. Madison).
Sample (student) answer essay